Charitable entities raising money from investors

Many charities and not-for-profit entities (NFPs) want to explore different forms of funding. We are also increasingly seeing a blurring of the lines between charitable entities and commercial entities. Examples include the rise of such concepts as social enterprise, impact investing and integrated reporting, to name a few.

Craig Fisher

This article explores some recent activity in relation to the ability of charities and other NFPs to raise money from investors, challenges faced, and a helpful resource from the Financial Markets Authority.

What is happening at the leading edge of the charitable sector in New Zealand

Achieving meaningful impact in the charity world continues to evolve. It is truly refreshing and inspiring to see charities and NFPs doing some great work but not always in the way it has been done before. We are also fortunate in the sector to have some very smart and restless minds constantly seeking innovative new ways to approach seemingly intractable old problems.

Whether these problems are social, environmental or other societal issues, thankfully, some of our brightest and bravest are seeking new solutions, driven partly perhaps by that famous saying along the lines of: “Doing the same thing and expecting a different result is actually a definition of insanity!”

Some of these new solutions are examples of big thinking – really making an impact by solving issues at scale. And some of them deal with expensive problems. Take social housing for example. No matter how innovative and inexpensive one can make housing designs, you cannot escape the fact that any attempt to make a noticeable difference involving the property market will be an eye-wateringly expensive exercise.

Also, by thinking big, all of a sudden some commercial enterprises start to take an interest. They generally want to be involved to assist but in doing so are heavily, or sometimes totally, motivated by furthering their own commercial businesses and interests.

Then there is the Government – wanting to promote innovation and sometimes fund solutions, but also understandably seeking to get the best leverage from their involvement and investment. Hence the Government appears keen on possible solutions that can harness a range of different parties such as charities, philanthropists and other funders, as well as commercial interests and others.

On one hand we appear to have a Government keen on promoting innovation and new approaches. That’s great. But as we have noted already, many of these new approaches also require considerable funding.

Then, on the other hand, we have a Government implementing a range of new regulations which can be seen by some to restrict innovation or, at the very least, be a considerable disincentive to those brave souls pouring all their energies into trying to get some innovative solutions off the ground.

And with respect, while generally sound at a policy level, the level of increased or new regulation across a range of areas and its impact is considerable. Take a charity involved in social housing provision. In the past few years it will have been impacted by a host of new legislation and regulation such as new:

• charities legislation;

• financial reporting legislation;

• anti-money laundering and counter-financing of terrorism legislation;

• building code changes, specifically regarding leaky buildings and earthquake strengthening;

• health and safety legislation;

• responsibilities and liabilities on directors and governing body members; and

• upcoming incorporated societies legislation (if that is their legal structure).

And that is just to name a few.

If that charity wanted to raise some funds other than donations to help fund their activity, then it will also likely have been impacted by our new financial markets legislation and regulation.

What has been happening in the financial regulation world in New Zealand

A few years ago, we got a new financial markets regulator in New Zealand – the Financial Markets Authority or FMA, as it is commonly referred to.

The FMA is an independent Crown entity and took over the roles of a number of previous agencies, most notably the Securities Commission. Its stated mandate is that it is “responsible for ensuring public confidence in our financial markets and supporting the growth of New Zealand’s capital base through effective regulation.” This mandate is interesting when one thinks about charities and why they exist.

Much of our financial markets legislation (such as the old Securities Act) has now been repealed and, in 2014, the FMA began working under a much wider mandate with the introduction of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMC Act). This is new legislation with, in some respects, quite a different policy approach to regulation of markets compared to the old securities legislation and regulation it replaces.

As such, prior to Christmas 2015, the FMA issued a discussion document on its intention to revoke the previous Securities Act (Charity Debt Securities) Exemption Notice 2013. While applying to a relatively small number of charities this was in our view a useful, pragmatic exemption for charities wishing to raise funds from the public. RSM assisted The Tindall Foundation to jointly submit on this.

Not surprisingly, the FMA concluded there was no reason to keep this exemption. It operates under the FMC Act and anything it does must fit under that Act. The exemption, while useful, was a leftover from old revoked securities legislation and did not really fit into the FMA’s mandated framework going forward.

However, (hopefully) useful points were still made in the consultation process including that:

• charities do have different features, including a layer of regulation and transparency, from being registered charities already;

• charities have entirely different motivations, to profit-seeking issuers; and

• if regulation is too “one size fits all” and heavy-handed, it will stifle fledgling innovation.

Where to from here?

So without the old exemption what can charities do? And how can they navigate what to many are the complex options under the FMC regime?

Helpfully, the FMA has attempted to answer this question by producing a useful information sheet outlining the different options for community and voluntary organisations wanting to borrow money from investors (see

While not being the Holy Grail perhaps hoped for by some in the sector, this guide at least provides a helpful explanation of what is possible as regards existing avenues of raising funds from investors in New Zealand.

Craig Fisher FCA is an Audit Partner and Chairman of RSM. Craig is a specialist regarding not-for-profit and charitable entity issues. He can be contacted by phone on (09) 367 1654, by email at, or visit RSM’s website

Contact Us
Phone 09 303 5270
Fax 09 309 3726